Hungary have become the first European country to officially ban all Rothschild banks from operating in the country.
In 2013, Hungary began the process of kicking out the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and agreed to repay the IMF bailout in full in order to rid the country of the New World Order banking cartel.
A kindly worded letter from Gyorgy Matolcsy, the head of Hungary’s CentralBank , asked Managing Director, Christine Lagarde of the International Misery Fund, as some have fondly nicknamed it, to close the office as it was not necessary to maintain it any longer.
The Prime Minister, Viktor Orban, seemed keen to ease off austerity measures and prove that the country could go it alone. It in fact issued its first bond in 2011, borrowing off the global markets.
Hungary borrowed €20 billion loan to avoid becoming insolvent during the economic crisis in 2008. But the debtee debtor relationship has not been smooth sailing.
Many criticised the Prime Minister as making an ill-advised decision in order to win an election, which was due in 2014. He also wanted to refrain from having too many foreign eyes on their economic policies, as many reforms were criticised as being undemocratic.
Paying the loan back early has meant Hungary have saved €11.7 million worth of interest expenses, but Gordan Bajnai, leader of the electoral alliance E14-PM, claimed that they had actually lost €44.86 million by March 2014 because of the early repayment as all they did was replace the loan from the International Mafia Federation (another nickname, we’re still talking about the IMF here) with a more expensive one, labelling the stunt as Propaganda .
And what made further nonsense; another loan at high interest rates was signed to finance a nuclear upgrade, which will mean not only higher repayments but also high electricity costs. But they do have economic sovereignty now.
Many have claimed that the IMF AKA ‘Imposing Misery and Famine’, are owned by the Rothschild group, the biggest banking group in the world, having their fingers in almost every central bank in the world. This means that not only do they make money off usurious interest rates at the misfortune of crumbling economies, they also literally own Governments and people of power – I mean they have considerable influence.
Escaping the banking clutches is therefore, iconic. Iceland joined Hungary in 2014 when it paid back its $400 million loan ahead of schedule after the collapse of the banking sector in 2008 and Russia, of course bowing down to no Western puppeteer, freed itself in 2005, one wonders what other strings are attached though — and how long it will be before the international bankers wheedle their way back in.
The return of these three countries to financial independence has been said to be the first time a European country has stood up to the international fund, since Germany did so in the 1930s. Greece is anxiously trying to make payments but missing them as we all stand on the sidelines routing for them to stick two fingers up to the ‘International M***** F******’.
Three developments are shaping the current world situation: an increase in social tensions, the intensification of international political conflicts and the increasingly undisguised preparation of the Western alliance for war against Iran.
The mainstream media try to miss no opportunity to tell the international public who will be friend and who will be foe in this coming war. Time and again, Iran’s allies Russia and China are depicted in the most negative light possible, while there is almost no mention of Israel’s and Saudi Arabia’s crimes in Yemen and against the Palestinians.
At the same time, the media are doing everything they can to conceal the most important reason behind the drive for the war – the critical state of the global financial system. Journalists are bending over backwards to convince the public that the global economy has completely recovered from the 2007/2008 crisis, that we are witnessing a global economic boom and that the dangers in the system are under control.
In fact, none of these claims are true. The simple reason is that they all ignore the historic importance of the cross-border manipulation by the central banks, which was necessary to save the system from collapse after it nearly broke down in 2007/2008, and which still keeps it alive today.
The global financial system would no longer exist without manipulation
This manipulation has set in motion a development that can be compared to the fate of a patient who survives a severe crisis only through an injection of addictive drugs and who would be killed by a subsequent withdrawal treatment because of his poor state of health. In other words, without money injections and low interest rates and without the purchase of government and corporate bonds by central banks, the global financial system, as we know it, would no longer exist.
The world’s leading central bankers are well aware of this. This is shown by their futile attempts to turn the wheel. Even the most timid announcements to contain the flood of money and significantly increase interest rates send such shock waves through the financial community that it is already clear: there can be no return to a normality in which no excess money is printed, interest rates are raised to a level that was once considered normal and no more bonds or shares are bought by the central banks.
So what will happen next? Will central banks simply continue the policy of the past ten years? After all, nobody can stop them from printing unlimited amounts of money and lowering interest rates – along the lines of the Swiss Central Bank – into negative territory…
In fact, nobody can stop them, but the consequences these measures would bring with them are foreseeable: A further increase in speculation, even greater volatility in the markets, an even stronger inflation of the bubbles, which are almost bursting already, the complete destruction of the classic banking business (lending against interest rates), the disintegration of traditional commercial banks and savings banks, the complete takeover of markets by investment banks and hedge funds, the collapse of pension systems – to name but a few of the expected consequences.
The biggest danger is the loss of confidence in the monetary system
Worse than any of these consequences is the creeping loss of confidence in the entire monetary system, which has not been tied to any real value since the decoupling of the US dollar from gold in 1971. It can be assumed that at some point it will affect the entire system, lead to a panic in the markets and cause the global financial card house to collapse.
How close we have already come to this point was shown by the dramatic price fluctuations of the US stock index Dow Jones in February of this year. It appears that this was a test run in which the US Federal Reserve, which is permanently on standby to prevent major price crashes, only intervened at the last second. These fluctuations were the strongest that the Dow Jones has experienced in its more than 100-year history.
This may have been a serious warning to the world’s financial elite. In any case, both the Skripal affair in Great Britain, the trade war instigated by the US against China and the recent hostile reaction towards Russia by most EU states are strong indications that the elites have decided to seriously consider an option that the German economist Ernst Winkler in 1952 described as “the best means put off the final catastrophe of the entire capitalist system over and over again” – the option of waging a war.
The Pentagon and Poland Wednesday signed a $4.75 billion deal to sell the eastern European country the Patriot anti-missile system.
While Poland’s extreme right-wing government hailed the arms deal, the largest in the country’s history, it will undoubtedly further stoke tensions between the West and Moscow, which has viewed the deployment of such systems as part of a concerted effort by Washington and its allies to undermine Russia’s ability to defend itself against a nuclear attack.
“It is an extraordinary, historic moment; it is Poland’s introduction into a whole new world of state-of-the-art technology, modern weaponry, and defensive means,” Polish President Andrzej Duda said during the signing ceremony, which was held at an armaments factory before a column of Polish troops.
“It’s a lot of money, but we also know from our historical experience that security has no price,” said Duda, whose authoritarian regime will no doubt extract the money to pay for the missiles through redoubled attacks on the living standards of Polish workers.
The Polish arms deal has been inked in the midst of a coordinated international campaign led by London and Washington to indict Moscow for the poisoning of the ex-Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter in the southern English city of Salisbury on March 4.
Russia has denied any involvement in the poisoning, which the British authorities have claimed was carried out with a nerve agent “of a type” (Novichok) that had once been manufactured in the Soviet Union and that it was “highly likely” that the attack was the work of Russia.
Without presenting any evidence to substantiate these accusations — much less any conceivable motive for Moscow to carry out such an action on the eve of the presidential election in Russia — the British Conservative government of Prime Minister Theresa May expelled 23 Russian diplomats.
London has refused Moscow’s requests to supply a sample of the alleged nerve agent used in the attack, as is required by international chemical weapons treaties. The Russian Foreign Ministry issued a statement Wednesday charging that the attitude of the May government shows that “UK authorities are not interested in finding out the motives and those responsible for the crime in Salisbury and suggests that the British intelligence services are involved in it.”
Washington joined this anti-Russian crusade, ordering the expulsion of 60 Russian diplomatic personnel and the closing of the Russian consulate in Seattle, while joining with London in pressuring other countries to follow suit. More than 20 other countries responded with expulsions. Most of these countries took only token actions, however, involving one or two Russian diplomats. Nine members of the EU took no action. The only expulsion of more than four diplomats in Europe came from the rabidly anti-Russian government of Ukraine, which ordered 13 Russian diplomats to leave the country.
Poland, which along with Germany, France and Canada was one of the countries expelling four Russians, has long served as a pillar of the military buildup by the US and NATO against Russia.
Since the coming to office of the Trump administration, Washington has openly promoted the forging of closer ties to Warsaw and other eastern European governments, reviving the so-called Intermarium project of the 1920s, in which the US sought an alliance with fascistic and right-wing regimes in the region directed against both the Soviet Union and the rise of Germany as a continental hegemon.
The turn toward Eastern Europe is in large part a response to mounting tensions between Washington and Germany, which is increasingly seeking its own great power interests, including through commercial and other ties with Russia. While Berlin joined with the UK, France and the US in signing a joint declaration blaming Russia for the Skripal poisoning, there exist sharp divisions within the German ruling establishment and Chancellor Angela Merkel’s grand coalition government over the issue.
“We must do everything possible to prevent a new Cold War with Russia,” Social Democrat Gernot Erler, the government coordinator for Russia, told the Passauer Neue Presse.
Other prominent Social Democrats went further. Former European Commissioner Guenter Verheugen questioned the objective basis for the sanctions. “The view that if in doubt, ‘Putin and the Russians are responsible for everything’, is one that poisons thought and must stop,” he told the Augsburger Allgemeine.
Such views reflect the concerns of major German corporate and financial interests, whose profits are tied up with the Russian market.
The German Committee on Eastern European Economic Relations, whose members include some 200 German companies, warned against “over-hasty conclusions” over the Skripal affair leading to a “spiral of escalation.”
Just one day after it expelled a handful of Russian diplomats, the German government on Tuesday announced final approval for the construction and operation of the Russia-led Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, which will pipe Russian natural gas to Germany under the Baltic Sea. The project has been bitterly opposed by both Washington and its Eastern European allies.
It is no doubt such tensions that the US defense secretary, Gen. James Mattis, had in mind when he told reporters at the Pentagon that Russia was “trying to break the unity of the Western alliance.” Mattis claimed that it was “pretty obvious” that Russia was responsible for the attack on Skripal and charged Moscow with having “chosen to be a strategic competitor, even to the point of reckless activity.”
The sharp divisions that have emerged among the NATO powers notwithstanding, there are continuous signs that active preparations are underway for war with Russia.
Senior US military officers speaking at the Association of the United States Army’s Global Force Symposium on Monday issued warnings that the Pentagon must “dramatically increase the range of the service’s artillery and missile systems to counter a Russian threat that would leave ground forces without air support in the ‘first few weeks’ of a war in Europe,” the website military.com reported. The American military, the officers revealed, is working on a number of new weapons systems designed to counteract supe’ve got to push the maximum range of all systems under development for close, deep and strategic, and we have got to outgun the enemy,” Gen. Robert Brown, commanding general of United States Army Pacific Command, told an audience of military officers and defense contractors.
Meanwhile, the European Commission, the executive arm of the European Union, announced Wednesday that it has launched an initiative to create a “military Schengen zone,” allowing NATO military forces to freely cross European borders. The military project is being unveiled even as right-wing nationalist and anti-immigrant European politicians, including Germany’s new Interior Minister Horst Seehofer, are openly rejecting the original Schengen Agreement, in effect for over two decades, which allows border control free travel between the 26 European countries that signed on to it.
EU transport commissioner Violeta Bulc told reporters that the aim was to ensure “quick and seamless mobility across the continent. This is a matter of collective security.”
In addition to removing border controls, she said that investments would be made to assure that key corridors would be capable of handling tanks and heavy military vehicles. “We must be able to quickly deploy troops either within the EU or rapidly launch military operations abroad and to do so we need infrastructure that is fit for the purpose.”
Russian Deputy Defense Minister Col. Gen. Alexander Fomin responded to the announcement by stating that the real goal was to “fast-track to the maximum extent … deployment towards Russia’s borders.”
He also told the Russian Defense Ministry’s official newspaper that the US and NATO were creating arsenals of weapons ammunition and food supplies in various countries, including Poland, Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria, Slovakia, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, to prepare for war with Russia.
- In order for a given population to maintain itself over 25 years, it must have a fertility rate (number of children born per woman) of 2.11
- Europe’s white collective fertility rate stands at 1.38
- Islamic/third world migrant fertility rates are above 8
- Once the white fertility rate falls below 1 the white population will be in terminal decline
The Genocide Convention defines genocide in part C of their Article 2 as:
“Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”
The primary means to achieving this end, is through mass third-world immigration, against the will of the people and the promotion of miscegenation. For immigration, citizens have to worry about whether they can afford to have kids, have a large enough home, etc. Immigrants drive down wages, drive up unemployment, and make neighborhoods unsafe to raise children, so people need more money to raise their children in a safer place. In contrast, immigrants receive welfare so they can have as many babies as they like and do not have to ask themselves whether they can afford it or not. The government pays the immigrants and takes care of it all, and if they need a bigger apartment, that is paid for by the government even if this happens to be a family with already fifteen children. This is a short term investment in a more favorable population for rule.
As the elites would have us believe, this is not an opportunity to remedy incidentally ‘falling western birthrates’, neither is it about ‘taking in the victims’ of war torn nations, this is by design, has long been in the planning — and has grave implications for genetic disparity between the ruling class and the newly forming ‘genetic underclass’ — whites once bridged the gap between the two, now the white genotype is set to be greatly reduced, made an electoral minority, and possibly even eliminated altogether.
If the elites truly wanted to boost Western populations they could launch pro-natal schemes to pay people to have more children — instead, they opt for total population replacement; using the false ‘migrant victim’ narrative to justify it.
Most people do not realize that Jews are the driving force behind the population replacement.
Supremacist ethnic Jews oppose white nationalism and support demographic genocide in white countries — at the same time they support Jewish nationalism and oppose non-Jewish-immigration into Israel.
This is for a few primary objectives:
- The lower IQ a population possesses (i.e. third world populations), the easier it is to control and manipulate that population. It also widens the gap between Ashkenazi Jewish genes and the general population’s genes, giving the rulers a stronger foothold and more genetic centralization.
- Ideal demographic: Third world migrants are an excellent way to steer a democracy; they are a pro-state, collectivist, and anti-liberty electorate; they will vote the way you want them to if you satisfy their material needs, this naturally supports globalism. First world populations are generally more value oriented and individualist, which naturally opposes globalism, hence the anti-white narrative being pushed.
- Third world migrants often work lower pay jobs than Westerners, they will settle for lower standards.
- Cultural genocide: dilute and eventually eliminate Western culture and all its anti-globalist attitudes.
Once you change the people, you change the basics of a nation.
For example, if the Soviet Union had brought one million Somalis in back in 1956 to punish the Hungarian rebellion — then Hungary would be a lot worse off.
The streets would not be safe. And the Somalis would breed 10x the rate of native Hungarians and would gradually take over the country just like cancer does to a body.
It would be a potent form of demographic and cultural suppression, wiping out Hungarian nationalist sentiments and enabling the Soviets greater control over Hungary. Even if the Somalis weren’t typical ‘invaders’, their characteristics & ‘tabula rasa’ (blank slate) effect was a useful tool to the oppressive Soviet regime in neutralizing Hungarian nationalism and exercising demographic complicity in the regime.
The same principle translates to modern day European mass-migration.
If you get a large number of people of one genetic variant and culture and impose that group onto another genetically and culturally differing group you cannot expect the target group to remain unaffected.
“Europe is today incapable to protect its borders against unarmed invaders.”— Viktor Orbán, Hungarian Prime Minister in 2015.
Order out of chaos: breaking down established cultural and genetic homogeneity.
The more you can divide and conquer by balkanizing the cultural composition of Western nations — the easier it will be to impose centralized globalist political unions like the EU.
In a matter of decades I believe the EU will be stronger than ever because the electorate across Europe will vote very differently due to the mass population replacement happening now — this is the long term strategy of the elites.
Vacating the middle east for Israeli expansion.
The strategic demographic population replacement in Europe can be traced back to the middle east where Israel is slowly expanding its borders — gradually occupying vacated, bombed-out areas, and populating them with Israelis.
The NATO ‘collateral damage’ bombing of civilian areas has forced many middle eastern natives to vacate their homelands; creating a regional vacuum ready to be seized by Israel’s territorial encroachment.
Anti-fertility strategies aimed at abolishing whiteness and changing the face of the human genome.
Many anti-fertility strategies have been deployed by Western elites to reduce the white population’s fertility rate, the goal being to get it below 1, which will eventually wipe out Caucasian genetics altogether, or make it a dwindling minority — this is covert genocide at every level.
“We’ll keep bashing the dead White males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as the White race is destroyed. Not deconstructed, but destroyed.”
“The goal of abolishing the White race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed White supremacists.”
— Noel Ignatiev, American author and historian. He is best known for his work on race and social class and for his call to abolish “whiteness”.
Fertility-targeting & anti-white strategies include, but are not limited to:
- eroding the family structure,
- undermining natural gender roles,
- imposition of the welfare state as the new ‘provider’,
- mass-introduction of fertility-reducing chemicals,
- propagation of cultural white guilt & ‘white privilege’ ideologies,
- encouragement of miscegenation over in-group reproduction,
- making contraception widely available,
- gender quotas for managerial roles,
- promoting technology addiction, forces people to see the world in tunnel vision, divides & distracts society and reduces the birthrate,
- asserting that white equals evil, it’s ‘not okay to be white’.
- ‘body-acceptance’ to undermine natural & objective beauty standards,
- encouragement of hedonism as opposed to traditional attitudes to sexual partners,
- destruction of natural male and female archetypes,
- portrayal of the white cis male as the ‘enemy’ and ‘oppressor’,
- promotion of the gender wage gap as a reality and not a representation of innate gender preferences, gives the impression women are being held back and men are oppressors,
- encouragement of LGBT intended to confuse and divide the genders, links into and justifies the chemical gender-bending occurring in the background,
- promotion of the need for ‘diversity’ and ‘cultural enrichment’,
- promotion of the working woman that ‘don’t need no man’, promoting the anti-human idea of men as domesticated and women as the providers,
- promoting the idea of domestic wives as an antiquated & oppressive idea,
- mass-reduction of testosterone in men,
- arguing that women need to ‘toughen up’ and prove that they are ‘just as good as men’,
- promotion of the imaginary problems of ‘the patriarchy’, ‘rape culture’ and ‘cultural sexism’,
- criticizing innate male characteristics as ‘oppressive’, i.e. hysteria over mansplaining and manspreading,
- promoting, without evidence, the conspiracy of all white men as ‘evil misogynistic oppressors’, yet saying the evident mass-centralization of economic power is a ridiculous ‘conspiracy theory’,
- criticizing innate female characteristics as ‘submissive’,
- promotion and acceptance of androgynization of society; men as feminine and women as masculine and anything in-between — except, of course, archetypal genders themselves,
- capitalist and western hatred, portraying western people as historic oppressors, ignoring the fact every race has committed atrocities and has sought expansion,
- calling all skepticism of ‘progressive’ topics as misogynistic, xenophobic, racist or any combination of such snarl words,
- flooding academia, media, politics and every other Jewish-owned establishment with these talking points,
- characterization of white individualism and nationalism as segregationist and antiquated,
- priming migrant populations: creating racial tensions to prevent assimilation with western ideals as much as possible. Megabanks go in to Third World countries and create education programs for the nonwhites that teach them to have total, homicidal hatred of all white people. The programs also teach them to hate capitalism,
- the programs then teach the nonwhites that they must go to white countries and they must capture these countries, take over the government, and create a ‘New World Order’, (objective of the Jews). This is taught in Mexico, Nigeria, Venezuela, Sudan, South Africa and most Third World countries, particularly, black, mestizo, and Muslim countries,
- the facilities then give them ID cards (allowing them to vote) and set them up on full welfare – more than a US citizen gets on social security – and then large potions of that money is skimmed and given back to the organized crime groups. The US border patrol even said in 2016, “We’ve been ordered to complete the smuggling process.”,
- artificial reduction of white population IQ by deployment of chemical substances,
- claiming Western nations were originally nations of ‘immigrants’, completely ignoring the genetic argument,
- claim race does not exist, totally ignore the science behind it
- promotion of the migrant & minority victim narrative,
- promotion that only white people have to stop breeding because of human overpopulation while the R-selective nonwhites, who are the real cause of overpopulation, can breed as much as they want,
- over-representation of race relations and ‘white oppressor’ subjects in schools,
- and so on.
Anything that reduces the white birthrate and promotes dissension between the races, cultures & sexes.
Also check out:
Race Differences in Average IQ are Largely Genetic
Ancient Aryans of China
King Tut White European DNA Ancient Egypt
Fascinating Discussion about “The Bell Curve”, Race and Intelligence
The Surprising DNA Studies That Sent Egyptology Into a Tizzy
Ancient Tattooed Aryan Mummies of Asia
A 60-page review of the scientific evidence has concluded that race differences in average IQ are largely genetic – the Scientific paper
Reference website about race and IQ
Racial Differences and the Evolutionary Reasons for Them
African cognitive ability: Research, results, divergences and recommendations
Skin color affects ability to empathize with pain
IQ and the wealth of nations: How much reverse causality? – Gregory B. Christainsen